Fernando Monitiel klint
Mexico
Where do you locate yourself in relation to the systems you work with?
I place myself at the intersection between clinical rigor and the autonomy of error. I do not use AI systems to generate images, but to perform a biopsy of synthetic reality.
My position is that of an observer maintaining necessary distance: I do not seek symbiosis with the machine, but rather to record its behavior when confronted with concepts of biological vulnerability.
I locate myself at the limit where the algorithm ceases to be a tool of representation and becomes an agent of mutation. My practice occupies that sterile space where the system's perfection collides with organic memory, generating a third skin—neither human nor purely digital, but evidence of our ongoing transition to the posthuman.
Where are you heading, and what is pulling you there?
I am moving toward an absolute abstraction of the body, where identity dissolves into textures, protocols, and industrial surfaces. My vector moves away from biographical narrative toward the aesthetics of suffocation and containment.
What drives me is the tension between what we consider 'natural' and what systems impose as 'necessary.' I am drawn to the coldness of liminal spaces and the resistance of synthetic materials—metals, polymers, aluminum—when they attempt to contain life.
What pulls me there is the desire to document 'biological error' within perfect data architecture. It is a movement toward the inert, seeking that critical point where matter ceases to breathe and becomes an object of pure analysis.
How would you describe the space your practice is currently unfolding in?
My practice inhabits a liminal space between the operating room and the gallery. I do not seek to decorate space, but to sterilize it.
My work deforms everyday environments by imposing forensic laboratory logic, where every object or body fragment loses its original function to become a case study.
I reshape space through luminous coldness and material barriers—aluminum, lasers, clinical architecture—creating an atmosphere of silent surveillance. The space around my work ceases to be a place of transit and transforms into an aseptic coordinate system, where the viewer no longer observes an image but witnesses an ongoing systemic intervention.
Published in >
The AI Art Magazine, Number 3
Surface Anomaly : Unit, AI generation, 2026.
Surface Anomaly : Unit, AI generation, 2026.
Fernando Monitiel klint, Surface Anomaly : Unit, AI generation, 2026
Description
It is the record of a liminal environment where architecture manifests biological symptoms. The work shows an aseptic containment space that has been “infected” by an organic protuberance emerging from the cracks in the system. It explores the tension between industrial neatness and the persistence of flesh, suggesting that even the most rigid structures are subject to mutation.
Process
The need to visualize isolation and clinical sterility as a psychological state. I was interested in how a place designed for order and hygiene becomes disturbing when a biological error occurs. This is the starting point for The Third Skin: the scenario where the environment ceases to be a refuge and becomes a surveillance protocol.
Tools
Generation using diffusion models (AI) with an emphasis on minimalist architectural photography. Cold overhead lighting and the texture of concrete and metal were intentionally worked on to create a sense of physical reality. The technique focused on the “dead center” composition to emphasize the loneliness of the organic object against the immensity of the sterile wall.
Image credit:
