Name

_Results

close [x]

KKAI

Italy

Where do you locate yourself in relation to the systems you work with?

I locate myself in a pragmatic but non-idealized relationship with the systems I work with. I primarily use AI as a tool for generating images and videos, but not in pursuit of perfection or realism. I am not interested in seamless results or in presenting AI itself as content. Instead, I work with the system to make everyday elements appear slightly unfamiliar, allowing small shifts in perception to emerge. I rely on AI to realize my ideas, while remaining open to the unexpected outcomes it produces. These moments of surprise are not treated as technical achievements, but as points where control loosens and new meanings can surface. What matters to me is not how convincingly something is generated, but how subtly it destabilizes what is already familiar. My work mainly exists on screens and within networked contexts, where images circulate quickly and realism is often taken for granted. By resisting polish and technical spectacle, I position myself close to the system but without fully aligning with its dominant values. I use AI to extend my thinking, while maintaining a critical distance from its drive toward optimization and visual perfection.

Where are you heading, and what is pulling you there?

I am heading toward a faster, more immediate relationship between thinking and making. What pulls me in this direction is the accessibility and speed of AI. Its convenience allows ideas in my mind to be realized almost instantly, turning imagination into images or videos with minimal delay. This immediacy creates a continuous feedback loop, where each output quickly informs the next thought. Rather than seeing speed as a goal in itself, I treat it as a way to stay close to intuition. Rapid feedback helps me test ideas before they become fixed, keeping the work open, flexible, and responsive. AI, in this sense, acts as a catalyst rather than a destination—supporting a process that values iteration, adjustment, and discovery over finality. I am not moving toward greater technical complexity, but toward a practice where thinking, making, and reflecting happen almost simultaneously, allowing unexpected connections to surface in real time.

How would you describe the space your practice is currently unfolding in?

My practice is currently unfolding in a screen-based and networked space. This is a space shaped by speed, accessibility, and constant circulation, where images appear quickly and are rarely considered final. Working within this environment allows ideas to be tested and transformed in real time, keeping the process open and responsive. Rather than treating the screen as a neutral display, I approach it as an active space where everyday imagery can be subtly shifted and made unfamiliar. The rapid feedback enabled by AI turns this space into a site of continuous adjustment, where intuition, surprise, and iteration overlap. In this context, my practice does not aim to stabilize images, but to inhabit a provisional space—one defined by ongoing experimentation rather than resolution.
Published in >
The AI Art Magazine, Number 3
Paradise Lost, AI generation, 2025.
Paradise Lost, AI generation, 2025.
KKAI, Paradise Lost, AI generation, 2025

Description

Paradise Lost is a project inspired by the visual world of Persian Paradise Lost paintings. I draw from the sense of absurdity embedded in these works and use it as a starting point for my own reinterpretation. Rather than recreating the original pictorial imagery, I deconstruct it through the visual language of the contemporary, real world. By translating elements of absurdity from painting into everyday, recognizable environments, I allow them to reappear within reality itself. In this process, the imagined world of Paradise Lost is displaced into familiar settings, where it becomes subtly unsettling. This work is not a reproduction but a reconstruction. It operates in the space between the real and the unreal, the familiar and the strange, amplifying the absurdity present in the original imagery and reshaping it through contemporary modes of perception. Through this shift, the project aims to offer viewers a renewed visual experience—one that destabilizes expectations and invites a different way of seeing.

Process

Absurdity has long been central to my artistic interests. When I began exploring AI as a creative tool, Persian Paradise Lost paintings were among the first works that came to mind. Their dense compositions—filled with numerous figures, layered scenes, and the coexistence of heaven, earth, and hell—embody the artist’s expansive imagination. These works present a complete symbolic universe, where multiple realities unfold simultaneously. This richness strongly resonates with my own creative motivation: to explore complexity, contradiction, and the surreal within a single visual space. The paintings offered not only a visual reference, but also a conceptual structure that aligned naturally with the way I think and work. Using AI allowed me to re-engage with this imagined world from a contemporary perspective, translating its absurdity into a new visual language while preserving the spirit of imagination that originally inspired it.

Tools

I worked with a combination of AI-based image and video generation tools. I began by generating images using Midjourney, which served as the initial visual material. These images were then further edited and modified using Jimeng, allowing me to gradually adjust the visuals toward the scenes I had envisioned. After refining the images, I used Kling to generate video sequences, extending still imagery into motion. The final stage involved editing and assembling the generated material into a complete video work, shaping rhythm, continuity, and overall structure. Rather than relying on a single tool, my process moves across multiple systems, using each at a different stage to translate ideas into images, images into motion, and fragments into a coherent visual narrative.

Image credit:
Essay by