Name

_Results

close [x]

polina

United Kingdom

Where do you locate yourself in relation to the systems you work with?

situate myself inside AI systems without aligning with their default logic. I work from a position of proximity rather than mastery: close enough to feel their biases, failure modes, and aesthetic gravity from within, yet distant enough to resist being absorbed by their dominant visual language. My practice emerges from fashion, material culture, and the body. Fields historically grounded in labour, tactility, and desire. When I work with AI, I do not treat it as an author but as a terrain: one shaped by accumulated images, norms, and exclusions. I operate in the tension between authorship and delegation, intuition and automation, seduction and critique. Rather than seeking neutrality, I accept partiality and responsibility, working within constraints to expose how they shape what can appear, and what is quietly disallowed.

Where are you heading, and what is pulling you there?

I am moving toward practices that insist on authorship, embodiment, and accountability within automated image-making. What pulls me forward is a persistent tension: the seduction of speed and surface against a desire for slowness, density, and consequence. I resist the flattening effect of seamless generation, where everything becomes equally plausible and equally disposable, and instead follow questions of intention, trace, and decision-making. My trajectory is guided less by technological novelty than by the need to reintroduce friction, subjectivity, and ethical weight into processes designed to smooth them out.

How would you describe the space your practice is currently unfolding in?

My practice unfolds in a contested, unstable space: between fashion, image culture, and computational systems; between craft and automation; between desire and control. It is a zone where visual authority cannot be taken for granted and authorship must be continually renegotiated. Rather than settling into a discipline, my work disrupts the spaces it enters, revealing how aesthetics, power, and technology co-produce one another. After my work passes through, images are no longer neutral surfaces but charged sites of decision. Where responsibility, authorship, and consequence remain visible rather than concealed.
Published in >
The AI Art Magazine, Number 3
The Dinner, AI generation, 2025.
The Dinner, AI generation, 2025.
polina, The Dinner, AI generation, 2025

Description

Dinner captures one of the most tense, intimate, and haunting moments from Han Kang’s The Vegetarian. It’s a visualisation of the dinner scene, where desire, violence, and control collide at the table, and the body becomes a site of rebellion and discomfort. I wanted to translate the tension, the unease, the unspoken conflict, and the raw sensory intensity into a single image that lingers in the mind. It’s surreal and unsettling because that’s what the scene feels like when you experience it. Not just with your eyes, but with your whole body.

Process

The novel affected me deeply. This scene in particular left an imprint I couldn’t ignore. I had to externalise it, to feel it fully, and to make others feel it too. Dinner became my way of grappling with that intensity, turning emotion, tension, and bodily revolt into something tangible. It’s urgent, intimate, and uncontainable, like the story itself.

Tools

I start with sketches to explore form, gesture, and atmosphere. Then I moodboard and conceptualise details, refining the vision. MidJourney helps push the imagery into unexpected, visceral spaces, Photoshop helps me refine it, and I animate it with Higgsfield, Kling, and Veo3 to give movement and depth. Each tool serves to translate the inner tension of the scene into a visual language, giving presence to what words alone cannot hold.

Image credit:
Essay by