Wuh.ey

For me, working with AI is not about chasing perfection or replicating photography. It is about exploring tension between memory and invention, tradition and future, personal experience and collective memory. AI helps me explore these spaces, not as a shortcut, but as a mirror, a way to reflect and challenge ideas I have grown up with. I do not use AI to automate creativity. I use it to question it. Every artwork is constructed like a cinematic still: it suggests a before and an after, but never spells them out. That ambiguity is intentional; it invites the viewer to participate. My pieces often draw from symbolism, contemporary fashion, protest imagery, and everyday environments. I am especially interested in how these elements can exist together, not as decoration, but as essential layers of meaning. I want to reclaim style, identity, and history in a way that feels current and complex. I have always been drawn to the emotional and symbolic power of colors, masks, and patterns. I also resist the idea that AI art is empty or effortless. The process is highly intentional. I direct, select, and refine. There is a lot of thought behind the scenery, the characters, and the contrasts. I do not consider myself a designer or graphic artist. I create artworks with their own rhythm, symbolism, and internal logic. What I bring to the table is a perspective, not just a visual. This is what AI means to me: not a trend, but a tool for introspection. A space where I can play with visual codes, break them, and rebuild them on my own terms. In a world where truth and fiction blur more every day, my work is a deliberate act of creation that pushes against easy definitions and invites ongoing questioning.